Forskning
December 1, 2014
Low-energy diets differing in fibre, red mat and coffee intake equally improve insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes: a randomised feasibility trial
B Nowotny et al, 2014, Low-energy diets differing in fibre, red mat and coffee intake equally improve insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes: a randomised feasibility trial, Diabetologia, published online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT:
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS:
Epidemiological studies have found that a diet high in fibre and coffee, but low in red meat, reduces the risk for type 2 diabetes. We tested the hypothesis that these nutritional modifications differentially improve whole-body insulin sensitivity (primary outcome) and secretion.
METHODS: Inclusion criteria were: age 18-69 years, BMI ≥30 kg/m2, type 2 diabetes treated with diet, metformin or acarbose and known disease duration of ≤5 years. Exclusion criteria were: HbA1c >75 mmol/mol (9.0%), type 1 or secondary diabetes types and acute or chronic diseases including cancer. Patients taking any medication affecting the immune system or insulin sensitivity, other than metformin, were also excluded. Of 59 patients (randomised using randomisation blocks [four or six patients] with consecutive numbers), 37 (54% female) obese type 2 diabetic patients completed this controlled parallel-group 8-week low-energy dietary intervention. The participants consumed either a diet high in cereal fibre (whole grain wheat/rye: 30-50 g/day) and coffee (≥5 cups/day), and free of red meat (L-RISK, n = 17) or a diet low in fibre (≤10 g/day), coffee-free and high in red meat (≥150 g/day) diet (H-RISK, n = 20). Insulin sensitivity and secretion were assessed by hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp and intravenous glucose tolerance tests with isotope dilution. Whole-body and organ fat contents were measured by magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy.
RESULTS: Whole-body insulin sensitivity increased in both groups (mean [95% CI]) (H-RISK vs L-RISK: 0.8 [0.2, 1.4] vs 1.0 [0.4, 1.7] mg kg-1 min-1, p = 0.59), while body weight decreased (-4.8% [-6.1%, -3.5%] vs -4.6% [-6.0%, -3.3%], respectively). Hepatic insulin sensitivity remained unchanged, whereas hepatocellular lipid content fell in both groups (-7.0% [-9.6%, -4.5%] vs -6.7% [-9.5%, -3.9%]). Subcutaneous fat mass (-1,553 [-2,767, -340] cm3 vs -751 [-2,047; 546] cm3, respectively) visceral fat mass (-206 [-783, 371] cm3 vs -241 [-856, 373] cm3, respectively) and muscle fat content (-0.09% [-0.16%, -0.02%] vs -0.02% [-0.10%, 0.05%], respectively) decreased similarly. Insulin secretion remained unchanged, while the proinflammatory marker IL-18 decreased only after the L-RISK diet.
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: No evidence of a difference between both low-energy diets was identified. Thus, energy restriction per se seems to be key for improving insulin action in phases of active weight loss in obese type 2 diabetic patients, with a potential improvement of subclinical inflammation with the L-RISK diet.
